Manual entry is the failure point
Hand-keyed logs are slow, incomplete, and impossible to audit backwards. The data you need most in a recall is the data least likely to have been written down correctly.
Tangent Solutions builds passive traceability systems: cameras and computer vision that capture what actually happened on the line — lot, time, weight, movement, hand-off — without anyone stopping to write it down. The compliance file becomes a by-product of the work instead of another job at the end of the day.
Every food and industrial traceability programme has the same weak link: a person, holding something heavy, being asked to record data accurately. Paper logs go missing. Tablets get wet. Entries get backfilled from memory on Friday afternoon. When the request comes, the records don't reconcile — and the recall window is 24 hours.
Hand-keyed logs are slow, incomplete, and impossible to audit backwards. The data you need most in a recall is the data least likely to have been written down correctly.
FSMA 204 requires an Electronic Sortable Spreadsheet on request. If assembling it means a scavenger hunt through binders, you are already late before you start.
Compliance headcount competes directly with production headcount. Passive capture is the only version of this that doesn't cost you a shift.
Same underlying capability — detection, tracking, and structured event data — pointed at three very different problems.
Critical Tracking Events captured from the camera feed and written to a structured lot register, with a one-click FDA export.
Bespoke detection and classification models trained on your product, your line, your lighting — not a generic off-the-shelf SKU.
As an Axis Technology Partner we design, specify and integrate the physical layer — so the analytics land on infrastructure that can carry them.
No new hardware for the crew to carry. No app to remember. The camera watches the work, the model recognises the event, and the register fills itself in.
Cameras cover the points where lots change state — receiving, grading, transformation, shipping.
Models trained on your product identify the crate, the label, the scale reading, the operator, the movement.
Each detection becomes a structured event with a Traceability Lot Code, timestamp, location and quantity — validated on the way in.
When a request arrives, the register produces an FDA-ready Electronic Sortable Spreadsheet in one action.
A custom vision system monitoring PPE compliance across the working deck while automatically counting fish-food bags emptied into each silo — replacing a manual tally that had never reconciled cleanly with inventory.
Our reference implementation of passive traceability: operations feed, environmental monitoring with threshold alerts, harvest history, an FSMA 204 lot register with one-click FDA export, a GDST/EPCIS event stream, and a five-layer data-quality system that catches bad records before they enter the register.
Automated size and grade classification, shell and surface defect detection, harvest-readiness assessment on the conveyor or in the field.
Biomass and growth tracking, feed-waste reduction, water-condition thresholds and real-time alerting on surface and underwater feeds.
Public-facing livestreams built with CamStreamer and Flightradar24 — aviation and site cameras with real-time data overlays.
Traceability is a seafood-and-produce problem first, but the underlying capability is the same everywhere something moves through a process.
Shellfish and finfish grading, harvest logging, feed tracking, FSMA 204 lot registers and PPE compliance.
Harvest-ready detection, yield forecasting, early disease and pest identification, Food Traceability List compliance.
In-line quality control, defect detection, assembly verification and production-line automation.
Inventory and pallet tracking, dock-door event capture, cold-chain hand-offs and safety compliance.
Shelf and stock analytics, footfall and dwell measurement, loss prevention and queue monitoring.
Imaging-analysis support, patient-area monitoring, hygiene and protocol compliance.
Models trained on your data and your conditions. No repackaged generic detector that half-works on your product.
Axis Technology Partner. We speak lens choice, lux, mounting, PoE budget and network load — not just Python.
FSMA 204 Key Data Elements, GDST and EPCIS event structures designed in from the start, not bolted on later.
A small practice by choice. The person who scoped your system is the person who writes it and answers the phone.
Passive traceability means the record is created by observing work that is already happening — cameras and sensors log the event automatically — rather than by asking a worker to stop and type it in. The compliance record becomes a by-product of the operation instead of an extra task.
Usually not. We're an Axis Technology Partner and work with most ONVIF-compliant IP cameras. Where existing coverage is adequate we build on it; where it isn't, we specify only the additional views the traceability model actually requires.
No software makes you compliant on its own — compliance is a programme covering your records, your procedures and your traceability plan. What our systems do is capture and structure the Key Data Elements so that producing an FDA Electronic Sortable Spreadsheet within 24 hours is a single export rather than a week of searching.
A scoped pilot on one line or one site typically runs four to eight weeks from site survey to a working capture-and-export loop. Full rollout depends on site count and network readiness.
Yes. The same detection-and-event architecture runs in manufacturing QC, warehouse and dock operations, retail analytics, and healthcare monitoring. Food traceability is where the regulatory pressure is sharpest, which is why it leads — but it isn't the limit of the work.
Tell us where the records break down. We'll tell you honestly whether cameras can fix it — and what it would take.